As someone who does not speak legalese, I was grateful to have Aaron on my side. Although my case took quite a few years to deal with a trucking company and insurance from a multi-car accident (that caused me permanent injury), Aaron worked hard to meet my goals of compensation. He took the time to make sure I really understood the process and what my options were. If I ever find myself in need of a lawyer again, I will definitely return to Aaron!
Aaron is a knowledgeable and professional lawyer.
I deeply appreciated how he handled my insurance case. His understanding of both the legal system and the way insurance companies function....to the detriment of claimants....was excellent.
Perhaps equally important, he explained all of it in a compassionate and straightforward way without all the legalese getting in the way.
A key takeaway from the experience: Don't wait until time is running out to file a case. Insurance companies love to drag things out. Get him involved early!
I had the pleasure of working with Aaron Boland on a legal issue and he exceeded all my expectations. He provided excellent legal advice, was very knowledgeable about the law, and kept me informed throughout the entire process. He was always responsive to my questions and concerns, which I greatly appreciated. Aaron's professionalism and expertise helped me achieve my legal goals and I couldn't be happier with the outcome. I would highly recommend Aaron to anyone in need of legal services. Thank you, Aaron, for all your help!
Aaron Boland is a really good lawyer. He had the time to explain everything, He was always prepared and professional. Thank you!!
Aaron Boland was arrogant, disrespectful and totally unprepared. He had had three trials in the two weeks before my three day trial. Mr Boland did not cite law when arguing motions; he says he never objects to questions or responses which is absolutely unhelpful because he does not create a record. IMHO not objecting is really malpractice.
Also Boland did not get crucial exhibits into evidence—including both expert reports. He did not know that the objections to one of the expert report were not based on good grounds (question expert status, relevancy or standards used) but was based on prejudice to the other party but without stating any grounds. He did not quote Rule 26 or any case. He did not know or argue that the other side waited 36 days to file this motion to exclude the expert’s report; he did not point out that the other side was late in filing its reply…In fact Aaron seemed to be gunning for job with this law firm. Boland did not allow me to take notes or look at the defendant’s exhibits before the trial. He missed valuable opportunities to use their exhibits against them. Even though I gave him an outline of what exhibits needed to come in with what witness—he completely ignored that. However he wanted me to cull down the exhibits and was in danger of missing the deadline for the exhibits when he told me that he was “giving up his art class” on Th afternoon to get the exhibit book done. He was late filing conclusions of law and even later filing the findings of fact—so late it was useless. He apparently had no closing argument. “Well if a dog barking is a nuisance than surely flooding in a house is too” He waited forever to speak with my witnesses and waited until too late to subpoena in a city witness who was then on vacation…He is an unmitigated disaster.